Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 March 14

< March 13	March 15 >

March 14

File:GroupDeal- HomePage.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative fair use image. It is used in an article on Agriya, a web development company, as a stock photo of one of the sites they developed. B (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flo Jo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of an Olympic track+field athlete during a race used in three different articles - Florence Griffith-Joyner, History of the African Americans in Los Angeles, and List of Olympic records in athletics. There is already a PD-USGov photo of her, so there is no need for a fair use photo at all. B (talk) 01:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"""Keep""" I find that to be a lot of crap. Variety is nice and it's not like there are a million pictures of her on Wikipedia. The fact that the picture is being used on the History of African Americans in Los Angeles is a bit of a surprise considering there are no reliable sources stating she is solely of African American descent in the first place. This is lame reason for deletion.Mcelite (talk) 03:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use fair use pictures just to get "variety". Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content. --B (talk) 12:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I still see it as a great picture of her, she's at her peak and proudly holding the American flag. I just don't see it as excessive when there are only 2 pictures of her on her page.Mcelite (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not you consider it a "great picture" or believe that the fact there there are only 2 pictures of her on her page is insufficient has no bearing here. If there were more freely licensed pictures of her in existence, her page could be filled with them. The fact that there are not, and that a fair use argument has to be made for even one image of her here, means that the box is full, as it were. This image will be deleted under a fair use argument because we already have one picture of her under such an argument. That this image is good is irrelevant. I am sorry. KDS4444^Talk 12:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are other articles of notable people that have more than 2 pictures on their page. I just don't see it as issue with her article having 2 pictures. Each showing a different event in her life, I think they are big relevant and useful for Wikipedia.Mcelite (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With more than two fair use pictures? I don't think you are understanding the point of the fair use argument or what it means to be a photographer and have your copyrighted work used without your permission (which is, essentially, what fair use allows). We only allow the absolute minimum amount of such "infringement" on the rights of these professional photographers, and only with lots of justification for doing so. Here, there is no justification. That specifically is why the file cannot be retained. KDS4444^Talk 01:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-01.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Isometric 6.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, if we need such an image, it should be an svg B (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Isometric 5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, if we need such an image, it should be an svg B (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth shape03.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, and no evidence that the source image is under an acceptable license B (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth shape04.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, and no evidence that the source image is under an acceptable license B (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth shape02.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, and no evidence that the source image is under an acceptable license B (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth shape01.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, and no evidence that the source image is under an acceptable license B (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth shape00.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, and no evidence that the source image is under an acceptable license B (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-07.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-06.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-05.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 03:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-04.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 03:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-03.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-02.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I have no idea what this is, but if it's something we need, we can do it as a table - we don't need an image. B (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earth article.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unneeded Wikipedia screenshot B (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Planet cartesianusage3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, if we need one of these, it should be svg B (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-Amhara woman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - the subject is Betelihem Zelealem, producer of Motherland (2010 film) - Peripitus (Talk) 11:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, poor photo, no idea who this person is, conflicting licensing claim - is it PD or GFDL? B (talk) 03:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ethiopia African potrayal of Jesus.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, poor quality, tagged as PD because the artwork depicted is PD, but it's not merely a 2D photo. (If it showed the whole painting, we could crop it to just show the painting and fix the licensing problem, but it's really too bad to be useful.) B (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-Chesterfield 6.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LIARD (51).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Degrees of Separation Calculation.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, if we need this, it should be done in text, not as an image B (talk) 03:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-Cs screenshot.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, screenshot from a website so dubious licensing B (talk) 03:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image0004.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, photo is a derivative work of the artwork on this machine so it is likely not acceptably licensed. B (talk) 03:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frankfurtul7.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turnir u Freiburgu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image002ofkbeostutt.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Right Round video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: DEleted - image fails WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 11:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File contains no information to how it is notable or any critical response. An image of the bar it was filmed at could easily replace this image. MaRAno ^FAN 10:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as deletion nom is more than likely a form of WP:REVENGE for this: list of photos MaranoFan uploaded and are being nom'd for deletion by Chasewc91, the editor who uploaded the photo in question here. Further, the del nominator for this file was recently released from a month-long block due to repeated uploads of images in violation of the Wikipedia:Non-free content policy. I believe he's looking to hurt those he believes had a part in his block. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above disruptive user makes no argument as to how the file is notable but still claims it as a "Keep" argument. This should be noted. MaRAno ^FAN 22:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- I uploaded this a few years ago and certainly think it fails WP:NFCC#8 now, so I !vote to delete. Winkelvi, MaranoFan's actions are completely transparent, but that's not relevant here. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's relevant in that the transparent reasons for the nom makes it a dishonest nom. I think it's worth noting and having in the history, Chasewc91. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on Last time I checked, the "notability" (?) of an image was not a qualifying condition for its use under a fair use argument, and what, MaRAno ^FAN, is meant by "any critical response"? Response to what? If you want to nominate a file for deletion, you need to do a more thorough job of explaining why. The only questions before us are Is this image likely protected by copyright? (yes), and, Can a "fair use" argument be sustained for its inclusion anyway (...which...??). I do not see adequate argument against this, thus far. KDS4444^Talk 01:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- He didn't use the right words, but it's obvious what he meant. Please see WP:NFCC#8. The fair use image must be key to the user's understanding of the topic. I assume that he meant "commentary" when he said "response" - "critical commentary" on the image is a reason that you might want to use an image under a claim of fair use. --B (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potliquor-First-Taste.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although this album cover image was originally intended to be in an infobox in an article about the album, I have abandoned the album article and moved the infobox and the posting of that picture to the article about Potliquor, the group who recorded this album. This group and their music is very connected to the culture of the South (USA) and southern Louisiana. I make this case in the Potliquor article, and the cover art of this album strengthens that point. I believe that the usage of this image meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#9 (Restrictions on location) in that it appears in an article in which it is discussed and also meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 (Contextual significance) and WP:NFC#UUI §2 in that the critical commentary in the article concerning the imagery of the cover art connecting the band to their cultural context is strengthened by adding the actual image to the article. Crodog54 (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potliquor-Levee-Blues.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although this album cover image was originally intended to be in an infobox in an article about the album, I have abandoned the album article and moved the infobox and the posting of that picture to the article about Potliquor, the group who recorded this album. This group and their music is very connected to the culture of the South (USA) and southern Louisiana. I make this case in the Potliquor article, and the cover art of this album strengthens that point. I believe that the usage of this image meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#9 (Restrictions on location) in that it appears in an article in which it is discussed and also meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 (Contextual significance) and WP:NFC#UUI §2 in that the critical commentary in the article concerning the imagery of the cover art connecting the band to their cultural context is strengthened by adding the actual image to the article. Crodog54 (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potliquor-LouisianaRock&Roll.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although this album cover image was originally intended to be in an infobox in an article about the album, I have abandoned the album article and moved the infobox and the posting of that picture to the article about Potliquor, the group who recorded this album. This group and their music is very connected to the culture of the South (USA) and southern Louisiana. I make this case in the Potliquor article, and the cover art of this album strengthens that point. I believe that the usage of this image meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#9 (Restrictions on location) in that it appears in an article in which it is discussed and also meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 (Contextual significance) and WP:NFC#UUI §2 in that the critical commentary in the article concerning the imagery of the cover art connecting the band to their cultural context is strengthened by adding the actual image to the article. Crodog54 (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potliquor-Potliquor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although this album cover image was originally intended to be in an infobox in an article about the album, I have abandoned the album article and moved the infobox and the posting of that picture to the article about Potliquor, the group who recorded this album. This group and their music is very connected to the culture of the South (USA) and southern Louisiana. I make this case in the Potliquor article, and the cover art of this album strengthens that point. I believe that the usage of this image meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#9 (Restrictions on location) in that it appears in an article in which it is discussed and also meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 (Contextual significance) and WP:NFC#UUI §2 in that the critical commentary in the article concerning the imagery of the cover art connecting the band to their cultural context is strengthened by adding the actual image to the article. Crodog54 (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Best of Potliquor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Also fails WP:NFCC#9 and WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although this album cover image was originally intended to be in an infobox in an article about the album, I have abandoned the album article and moved the infobox and the posting of that picture to the article about Potliquor, the group who recorded this album. This group and their music is very connected to the culture of the South (USA) and southern Louisiana. I make this case in the Potliquor article, and the cover art of this album strengthens that point. I believe that the usage of this image meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#9 (Restrictions on location) in that it appears in an article in which it is discussed and also meets the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 (Contextual significance) and WP:NFC#UUI §2 in that the critical commentary in the article concerning the imagery of the cover art connecting the band to their cultural context is strengthened by adding the actual image to the article. Crodog54 (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TigerBlue.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3: redundant to File:YorkshireTigerLogo.svg. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Keverian.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found CC image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_Keverian_1980s_Massachusetts_USA_9519694698.png M2545 (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.